<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad Stats dot Org &#187; The Law of Large Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://badstats.org/?cat=6&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://badstats.org</link>
	<description>Just how good are those statistics?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Law Of Large Numbers &#8211; No!</title>
		<link>http://badstats.org/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://badstats.org/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Law of Large Numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badstats.org/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just yesterday the Washington Post got it wrong. In their Sports section there was a piece on Iowa&#8217;s prospects for the coming season. The claim: &#8220;The law of averages says Iowa will pay the price this season for escaping so &#8230; <a href="http://badstats.org/?p=1">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just yesterday the Washington Post got it wrong. In their Sports section there was a piece on <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/29/AR2010082903414.html">Iowa&#8217;s prospects</a> for the coming season.</p>
<p>The claim: &#8220;The law of averages says Iowa will pay the price this season for escaping so many  games last year with close wins.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Problem: The implication is that because Iowa won so many close games last year they will not be able to win so many close games this year.</p>
<p>The law of averages makes no such claims. It simply states that in the long run if winning a lot of close games is uncommon it won&#8217;t happen very often. It makes no claims about the relationship between what happen one year and what happens the following year.</p>
<p>What the paper did was equivalent to claiming that flipping a coin and getting heads will increase the chance of getting tails the next time, or that rolling a pair of dice and throwing an eleven makes it more likely that you will get a lower roll next time. In reality you are likely to get a lower roll the next time simply because the probability of getting an eleven or twelve is not very high on any roll of the dice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://badstats.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
